The Rachel Papers

[Note: Since Snarksmith is now over two years old, I've realized there's a lot of material in our archives which has, for one reason or another, become relevant again. The following is a post from last Spring about Rachel Corrie, a 23 year-old American activist whose death in Gaza (she was run over by an Israeli bulldozer) became a cause celebre for pretty much everyone -- left, right and center. A one-woman play was produced by Alan Rickman and journalist Katharine Viner based on cobbled-together entries from Corrie's years-spanning journal. The details of her demise and its co-option by Palestinians rights activists -- and by Yasir Arafat -- are still more interesting than the play itself, judging by Ben Brantley's review of in the New York Times. I'd done a little independent research into the (known) circumstances of Corrie's involvement in the International Solidarity Movement (the unimprovably acronymed ISM), her possible witting affiliation with terrorists, and the likelihood that her death was not an accident. My findings and comments are reprinted below. Also, I was fresh off an interview with Billy Bragg when I wrote this, and Billy, too, is back in the headlines with the release of his memoir/treatise The Progressive Patriot. I don't always agree with Ole Big Nose on the issues, and I find him much more temperate and thoughtful one-on-one than he is on stage when he's tubthumping for his indie rock lefty audience. But there is no denying his charisma, intelligence and wit. He's a very principled guy in an industry where merely mouthing the words "grassroots" and "activism" get you dining car access on the Chomsky Express. And as a modern political songwriter - even when the muse dips No-Blood-for-Oil low - Bill remains pretty much peerless.]
Now here would be an excellent time for conservatives -- who, I must say, have been out front and plangent about free speech in a way that should shame mainstream liberals -- to assert the wideness of that Enlightenment category. Rachel Corrie was a pro-Palestinian activist, member of something called the International Solidarity Movement (the acronym might very well say it all), and by most counts, one fucked up and misguided and possibly pharisaical 23 year-old. She was also run over and killed by an Israeli bulldozer in Gaza in 2003, an event that was labeled either "tragic" or not-so-very-tragic by hard-right types who, as ever, were in small possession of facts and great possession of blood pressure. She was also disgustingly and alarmingly turned into an overnight "martyr" by Yasir Arafat and a farouche jihadi constituency that was said -- and not just by hard-right types -- to have been abetted and gladly provided with protection and savehaven by ISM. Came the questions: Did the driver of the bulldozer "see" Corrie before he (vainly) applied the brakes? (His recorded dispatches to his superiors indicate that he had thought he ran over a man; if this was a contrived response, then reckless endangerment becomes first degree murder, a charge that Corrie's thoughtful defenders -- and by thoughtful I mean those outside of ISM, which has now taken to calling her the "new Anne Frank" -- are queasy to make.) Was there a cover-up by the IDF and Israeli investigators? Just how frazzled-innocent was the young Ms. Corrie to begin with, and does this matter in connection with her demise? And does any of this, intriguing though the forensics of it may be, usefully remind us, or distract from, the encompassing question of whether it's wise and just to plow down the homes of immiserated Palestinians? (The argument in favor suggests this is the only way of plugging up the underground tunnels which run through some of these homes, and which transport suicide-murdering terrorists to and from Jerusalem.)
Going on the "evidence against interest" assumption that those with the greatest degree of sympathy for Corrie's cause might have some interesting things to say about her outfit's true raison d'etre and methods, I read this Mother Jones piece:
Was it murder? Corrie's colleagues believe that it was. "I never dreamed it'd be like this, the intentional crushing of a human being," ISM eyewitness Joe "Smith" wrote in an affidavit filed with Palestinian human-rights attorneys. "I do believe it was intentional. I saw it, and I know he saw her, I know he did, and I know he knew she was still under the bulldozer when it backed up without raising its blade. I don't know if he wanted to kill her, or if he was just focused on doing his work and didn't care if he killed her or not, I don't know which is scarier." Five other activists testified that the driver must have seen Corrie before mowing her down. A damning sequence of photographs shot by ISM activists and almost immediately released by Reuters appears to show Corrie standing before the bulldozer and addressing the soldiers with her megaphone seconds before being crushed.Yet "Smith" later gave an interview in which he acknowledged that the bulldozer operator could well have lost sight of Corrie after she tumbled down the dirt pile. And the infamous photo series turned out to be misleading. In fact, the megaphone photo was taken hours before Corrie's death; she had handed the loudspeaker to a colleague some time before she was run over, and she was kneeling, not standing, in front of the machine when she was killed. As newspapers ran corrections, the activists claimed that Reuters had "miscaptioned" the photographs. The episode probably did more to mute anger over Corrie's death than anything else. The ISM activists were widely dismissed as frauds. In reality, they were probably just too young and inexperienced to know that if the media feels burned, it'll turn on you, or worse, ignore you.
The author goes on to cite some more trigger-fidgety incidents on the part of the IDF, involving the deaths of five more foreigners in the occupied territories -- deaths which received whimpering comparative media coverage. But then we get this:
ISM has also found itself placed on the defensive by its own recklessness. During a raid on their Jenin office on March 27, Israeli soldiers arrested Shadi Sukiya, an alleged Islamic Jihad guerrilla found hiding with two ISM activists. The idf says that Sukiya, 20, was a "senior militant" who'd sent four suicide attackers into Israel. ISM insists he was an innocent, terrified teenager who'd asked for refuge during an Israeli sweep. But following the incident, the International Committee for the Red Cross, which occupies an office in the same compound, asked the ISM to leave the premises. In late April, two Pakistan-born Britons posing as activists stopped in for tea at the group's office in Rafah. Five days later one Briton blew himself up at the entrance to a Tel Aviv pub called Mike's Place, killing three and wounding dozens. (The other escaped; his battered body later washed ashore near Tel Aviv.) The ISM denied any link to the bomber. "Their sole contact [with us] was a brief social encounter in Rafah in the Gaza Strip and no ‘links' were ‘forged' in such a short time," a spokesman said. Still, the perception has lingered that the group is a sympathizer -- and even a harborer -- of terrorists. "These unsubstantiated allegations about their involvement in terror have tarred all human-rights groups," says Sissons of Human Rights Watch. "Some of them are dedicated and disciplined, but in a difficult environment you also need to be smart. They've got a problem keeping control of their people."
Now, when I groked with Billy Bragg last weekend, he was very much conscious of what I hope it's not too bland or arch to label the "Rachel Corrie Question." But perhaps more important than the circumstances surrounding her death is, or was, a seaping miasma of self-censorship that has attended any open discussion of it, at least beyond the sphere of usual suspects shouting at one another across a thick, red line. A play, "My Name Is Rachel Corrie" (unfortunately resonant in its declarative urgency with Tom Wolfe's last novel), was cobbled together from her writings and directed by Alan Rickman in London. It was scheduled for trans-Atlantic debut in this fair city, but the producers of the New York Theater Workshop decided -- and here we'll have to dip into another grab-bag of cop-outs and euphemism -- that the issue was just too raw, what with the Bulldozer himself planning "pull-outs" of Israeli settlements in the West Bank and Gaza, and a war on in Iraq, and everything.
Bill's written a new song about the whole episode, the armature of which song has been lovingly swiped from Bob Dylan's "The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll." This is "The Lonesome Death of Rachel Corrie":
An Israeli bulldozer killed poor Rachel Corrie
As she stood in its path in the town of Rafah
She lost her young life in an act of compassion
Trying to protect the poor people of Gaza
Whose homes are destroyed by tank shells and bulldozers
And whose plight is exploited by suicide bombers
Who kill in the name of the people of Gaza
But Rachel Corrie believed in non-violent resistance
Put herself in harm's way as a shield of the people
And paid with her life in a manner most brutalBut you who philosophise disgrace and criticise all fears,
Take the rag away from your face.
Now ain't the time for your tears.Rachel Corrie had 23 years
She was born in the town of Olympia, Washington
A skinny, messy, list-making chain-smoker
Who volunteered to protect the Palestinian people
Who had become non-persons in the eyes of the media
So that people were suffering and no one was seeing
Or hearing or talking or caring or acting
And the horrible math of the awful equation
That brought Rachel Corrie into this confrontation
Is that the spilt blood of a single AmericanIs worth more than the blood of a hundred Palestinians
But you who philosophise disgrace and criticise all fears,
Take the rag away from your face.
Now ain't the time for your tears.The artistic director of a New York theatre
Cancelled a play based on Rachel's writings
But she wasn't a bomber or a killer or fighter
But one who acted in the spirit of the Freedom RidersIs there no place for a voice in America
That doesn't conform to the Fox News agenda?
Who believes in non-violence instead of brute force
Who is willing to confront the might of an army
Whose passionate beliefs were matched by her bravery
The question she asked rings out round the world
If America is truly the beacon of freedom
Then how can it stand by while they bring down the curtain
And turn Rachel Corrie into a non-person?Oh, but you who philosophise disgrace and criticise all fears,
Bury the rag deep in your face
For now's the time for your tears.
Bad as music, but even worse as politics. (I very much doubt FOX News holds sway at the scheduling conferences at the Theater Workshop. Nor does even an obstreperous editorial like this one in the Wall Street Journal contribute to the Orwellian erasure of Corrie's identity, any more so than bookstores banning Dane cartoons diminish the impulse to get one's hands on those selfsame cartoons, post haste.)
Another thing I was much disappointed to hear at the first of Bill's concerts I attended last week was that the lyric in "Help Save the Youth of America" that goes "They’re already shipping the body bags / Down by the Rio Grande / But you can fight for democracy at home /
And not in some foreign land" was altered for the live performance. I shuddered at the expected mutation, but when it came I wish I'd done more than shudder: Bill changed "Rio Grande" not to "Iraq," but to "Afghanistan." I know for certain that he supported the military removal of the Taliban, which makes you wonder if the use of the term "non-person" in the above stanzas isn't really the airing of a guilty conscience.
And as one of my comrades at the indispensible Harry's Place has shrewdly pointed out, "The implied comparison of Hattie Carroll to Rachel Corrie is as ridiculous as the implied comparison of William Zanzinger to the Israeli army." (Also vide Gene's -- the poster's -- noble outlawing of all readers' comments at Harry's Place that would callously mock the way in which Corrie perished.)
Nevertheless, the play's the thing, and it surely deserves it's run-time in Manhattan, which not-too-long ago hosted the Tim Robbins Follies known as Embedded. So what of the graces of the stage? Matt Wolf in the New York Times, reviewing the swift and originally unintended revival of "My Name Is Rachel Corrie" in London:
If this play doesn't exactly sanctify its subject, it still functions as a staged requiem that can't help but be both partial and partisan. One could take issue with Rachel's comment late on that the Palestinians are for the most part "engaging in Gandhian nonviolent resistance." But it's hard not to be impressed — and also somewhat frightened — by the description of her as a 2-year-old looking across Capitol Lake in Washington State and announcing, "This is the wide world, and I'm coming to it."Perhaps thanks to the controversy, Mr. Rickman's production has gathered power since I first saw it last April, and the material actually suits its current 750-seat West End berth better than it did a Royal Court studio space about a tenth the size. Ms. Dodds, an American whose London theater credits include Neil LaBute's "This Is How It Goes," is a decade or so older than Ms. Corrie was when she died. But the actress subtly moves from a shining-faced earnestness to something darker and more dangerous, as the fire in Ms. Corrie's belly builds into a conflagration. (One can only imagine what a young Vanessa Redgrave might have made of the role.)
Apt conduit that Ms. Dodds is, it remains fitting that a piece driven by Ms. Corrie's own language concludes with a brief film of her. There she is, age 10, arguing for the eradication of hunger by the year 2000 and to give "the poor a chance." Unexceptional sentiments? Perhaps, at least to anyone who has heard (or sung) any of a thousand comparable protest songs. But that doesn't diminish the singularity of Ms. Corrie's death or of this paean to her, which gives activism a necessary center stage without quite arriving at the realm of art.
To answer any questions that might be forthcoming, yes, I'd proudly demonstrate to get this play produced in New York. But that doesn't mean I'd do the same for brightening the flame of Ms. Corrie's questionable legacy.


















