Snarksmith: new york. gossip. art. politics. pop culture. literature. etc.: The Chaff From The Wheatcroft

New @ TNC:

One can be very lucky in one's political opponents. Geoffrey Wheatcroft may be an ardent foe of Tony Blair and a blushing admirer of Ron Paul and, as one of his compatriots likes to phrase it, a "bleeding Tory" to boot, but he is always worth reading on pretty much anything. (His Times piece on the origins of Israel and the intellectual distinctions among 20th century Zionists was one of the finest specimens of its type.) So it was with great pleasure that I just finished his short but potent essay in the New York Review of Books on the cult of Winston Churchill. Actually, "cult" is going too far because two of the authors under discussion in this collective review are admirers of the Last Lion -- John Lukacs and Lynne Olson. The first provides a book-length exegesis and commentary on Churchill's "Blood, Toil, Tears and Sweat" speech, the inaugural address he delivered as prime minister on May 13, 1940, just three days after the Nazis entered France. The second writes of the "troublesome young men," or rebel Tories (not so bleeding after all) who undercut Chamberlain in Parliament by voting against him and thereby faciliated Churchill's ascendancy, not to say bore minority witness to an event that in hindsight has made them all look delphic.
But the other two authors under review are the real trouble: Nicholson Baker and Pat Buchanan, both of whom argue against the legitimacy, necessity, and "goodness" of World War II and believe either that a cosmos of moral equivalence existed between the Allies and the Axis powers (this is Baker's pacifist claim in the bestselling Human Smoke: The Beginnings of World War II and the End of Civilization), or that Hitler was more victim than aggressor and was only cajoled into exterminating six million Jews because Churchill and Roosevelt decided to challenge him and did so, moreover, by joining with Stalinist Russia (this is Buchanan's isolationist and Spenglerian claim in Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost the Empire and the West Lost the World).

A blog post is not the medium for addressing the many and deep historiographical and moral failings of either thesis, nor can a single essay do full justice to the task. Wheatcroft is more restrained in his criticism of Baker and Buchanan than others have been (see especially Anne Applebaum's excellent review of Human Smoke in the New Republic, which does us the added favor of comparing Baker's style to that of bloggers and the online populist storehouse of knowledge known as Wikipedia). Though one observation bears reprinting:

Whether or not one follows Buchanan's apocalyptic vision of the West in terminal decline--like other conservatives, he doesn't seem to have noticed that communism has been routed--it is of course true that World War II led to the cold war and the forty-year subjection of Eastern Europe. But then much of what he is saying was said more concisely by A.J.P. Taylor long ago, in a throwaway line glossing the very speech that is Lukacs's main text, and the one phrase "victory at all costs." Taylor writes:

This was exactly what the opponents of Churchill had feared, and even he hardly foresaw all that was involved. Victory, even if this meant placing the British empire in pawn to the United States; victory, even if it meant Soviet domination of Europe; victory at all costs.

Here was the nub of the problem. To defeat Hitler meant paying a very heavy political price, and meant waging war, when there seemed no other way in 1940-1941, with methods which would have seemed atrocious not long before. "At all costs" for Churchill also meant the ruthless bombing of German and Japanese cities and the killing of their civilian inhabitants. Nothing is more chilling in Human Smoke than Churchill's language about this, especially since, as Baker puts it, Churchill saw bombing in pedagogic terms:

Let them have a good dose where it will hurt them most.... It is time that the Germans should be made to suffer in their own homelands and cities.... The burning of Japanese cities by incendiary bombs [will bring home their errors] in a most effective way.

Why, it might almost be Hillary Clinton threatening "to totally obliterate" a distant country.

I can recall Robert Conquest noting the grim irony of the cancellation of the war charter after Poland was not so much handed to Stalin on a platter as it was simply left there for him to take. But then, Conquest, like A.J.P. Taylor from the opposing ideological direction, has more than earned the right to point this out without sounding feverish or like he was peddling the kind of agenda one can download off the Internet. As for Wheatcroft, "chilling" is the right word -- not euphemistic or hyperbolic -- to describe Churchill's comment. Yet his bloody-mindedness fails to rattle the humanist instinct quite as much as it might otherwise have done when one realizes that these words were spoken after London had been subjected to a year of brutal aerial bombardment by the Luftwaffe, which killed approximately 43,000 British civilians. Here were the English being made to suffer in their own homeland and city and by a regime that largely kept score on the basis of how many innocents and noncombatants could be vaporized.

Though Wheatcroft doesn't mention it, the prelude to Churchill's dark prescription was that he should like to mete out "the measure, and more than the measure, that they have meted out to us," which is certainly "pedagogic" in one way but also less calculated in another. It is vengeful. However much war policy should not be determined by so low a motive, who among history's crop of statesmen or wartime leaders would be expected not to want to hit back just as hard, if not harder, than they have been hit? And would we desire any such person to be even remotely in reach of the reins of power (Wheatcroft's joke at Hillary Clinton's expense is also at his own since her maid of Saragossa militancy still allowed her to nearly get away with earning her party's nomination.)

Nicholson Baker is a pacifist and therefore believes war is never justified. His principles have made his tract tone-deaf, voulu, and slightly creepy -- but also, in its way, harmless. Even the untutored student of World War II can decide for himself, according to the in situ examples he provides, just how much there really was to choose between Hitler and Churchill. Baker's is the kind of sham argument, in other words, that doesn't improve by collecting evidence "out of context."

But Buchanan's cards are all showing, and they have been for years. He's made it his life's work to undo the established wisdom of the climactic event of the twentieth century and to offer this "alternative" history of the hot war against totalitarianism from the perspective of the lonely little America Firster who has been as hounded and excluded from the great debate as Germany was at Versailles in 1919. He'll find he's still got his work cut out for him. Some things are true and right even if every schoolboy has been taught to believe they are, and history to the defeated revisionists may say alas, but cannot help or pardon.

Since (late) 2004, satisfying your jones for political and cultural commentary, day-old scoops and late-breaking marginalia, and whatever else finagles its way into the cyber-planetary potluck...

Editors:

Michael Weiss

Nic Duquette

"My brilliant comrade."
-- Christopher Hitchens

"One of the most sophisticated, witty, thoughtful, erudite, subtle and unpredictable political/literary sites Ive come upon."
-- Ron Rosenbaum

"Brilliant."
-- Democratiya

"Ever brilliant."
-- Alexandra van Maltzan

"Great blog in general!"
-- Roger L. Simon

"Ever brilliant"
-- Matthew Harwood, The Guardian

"Nuts, but the writing is strong."
-- The Nation

"Urinal cake of wannabe hipsterism."
-- Crooked Timber

• Civil Disobedience on the Web
By Michael Weiss {British bloggers stand up to threats of libel lawsuits., originally published in Slate.}

• Spray-Fire Atonement
By Michael Weiss {How cognitive behavioral psychology can help High Holy Day Jews who repent too much., originally published in Slate.}

• Mutiny on the Manifesto
By Michael Weiss {Spineless scalawags are sabotaging the most promising leftist doctrine in decades. Don't let them., originally published in Jewcy.}

• The Dilettante's Guide to the Michael Vick Scandal
By Michael Weiss {Seven ways to liven up the inevitable conversation this weekend, originally published in Jewcy.}

• Don't Drink the Balloon Juice
By Michael Weiss {What not to name your blog, published in Slate.}

• Here Come the Cyber Wars: Are We Ready?
By Michael Weiss {A survey of the Estonian cyberwar, originally published in Reason.}

• Unconsummation: The sexual battleground before the Revolution.
By Michael Weiss {Ian McEwan's On Chesil Beach, originally reviewed in The Weekly Standard.}

• Rise of the Faux-cialists
By Michael Weiss {Three poseurs who would have Marx spinning in his grave (plus their real-deal counterparts), originally published in Jewcy.}

• Man of Letters: Kingsley Amis, the laureate in prose of postwar Britain
By Michael Weiss {Zachary Leader's biography of Amis, originally reviewed in The Weekly Standard.}

• Stepson of the Time
By Michael Weiss {A reconsideration of Vasily Grossman's Life and Fate, originally published in The New Criterion.}

• The Surge Can Work
By Michael Weiss {Everyone's wrong about the president's new war plan, originally published in Jewcy.}

• A Kibitz on Pure Reason
By Michael Weiss {The author of Betraying Spinoza on rationalism, passion, and great 17th-century hair, originally published in Jewcy.}

• Brainwashing's Nemesis
By Michael Weiss {How Rick Ross became a cult buster extraordinaire, originally published in Jewcy.}

• The Whiz Kid of Warfare
By Michael Weiss {How Noah Shachtman has revolutionized military reporting, originally published in Jewcy.}

• A Blacklist The Left Could Use
By Michael Weiss {Meet the Christopher Hitchens of postpunk, originally published in Jewcy.}

• Is Marriage the New Dating?
By Michael Weiss {A divorcee, a young married, and a singleton debate wedded bliss, originally published in Jewcy.}

• The Jewish Jihad for Jesus
By Michael Weiss {Why converts are leading the evangelical movement, originally published in Jewcy.}

• Tribal Threads
By Michael Weiss {The designer of Gytha Mander on the holy land, holsters, and honeys, originally published in Jewcy.}

• Some Kind of Republican
By Michael Weiss {The real legacy of John Hughes, published in Slate.}

• Moochers of the World, Unite!
By Michael Weiss {The true genius of Entourage, published in Slate.}

• Imagining Conservatism
By Noah Joshua Phillips {George Will's nostalgic conservatism debunked.}

• Servicing Stalin
By Michael Weiss {Robert Service's lousy biography of the ogre of the East.}

• If Children Don't Understand Evolution, Maybe It's Because We Don't Teach Them Science
By Nic Duquette {False mental categories and primary assumptions in the Intelligence Design debate, naturally deselected.}

• Affirmative Conservatives
By Nic Duquette {The ivory tower kulturkampf version of corporate welfare.}

• Affirmative Conservatives II: David Horowitz and "Academic Freedom"
By Michael Weiss {Bias doesn't end at the quadrangles, and why this isn't such a bad thing.}

• What's Your Blog Worth?
By Nic Duquette {The essay that launched a thousand trackbacks, and made DailyKos lie about his income.}

• It's The Stupidity, Economists: The Debate Over Social Security
By Nic Duquette {Paul Krugman gets it wrong, but fortunately his shrillness doesn't suffer.}

• Will China Buy GM?
By Nic Duquette {Weighing the possibilities of the great rev forward.}

• The Less Deceived: John Kerry and the Postwar Tragedy of Vietnam
By Michael Weiss {Election cycle dress-blues.}

• When Philosophers Collide: Matthew Stewart's The Courtier and the Heretic
By Michael Weiss {Another felicitous installment in the meet-profound genre.}

• YBRET: Lunar Park Reviewed
By Michael Weiss {Bret Easton Ellis can't write, and wants to prove it to you. Again.}

• Freaky Deaky: A Rogue Economist Has Fun, And So Do We... Up To A Point
By Max Gross {Freakanomics, or It's Not a Crack House, It's a Crack LLC.}

• The Schiavo-esque Death of the Novel
By Nic Duquette {Why is our nation unread?}

• A Beautiful Mind: Rebecca Goldstein's Goedel
By Michael Weiss {Incompleteness made simple.}

• Yawn: Malcolm Gladwell's Just-Okay Bestseller
By Michael Weiss {Use your intuition to turn a fun 5-page magazine article into a 200-page book with covers and everything.}

• A Tiny Receptacle for a Thrilling Tale: Michael Chabon Reins Himself In and, Finally, Delivers What He's Promised
By Nic Duquette {What he said.}

• Magic for Grown-Ups: Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrel
By Nic Duquette {Highbrow Harry Potter.}

• Comical Chic: David Sedaris Still Has It
By Nic Duquette {The pleasures of Dress Your Family In Denim and Courduroy.}

• Sex, Highs, and Videotape: Havoc: The Unrated Version
By Michael Weiss {Anne Hathaway redeems all schlock, especially with no shirt on.}

• Who's Your Huckleberry?: Tombstone as an American Classic Western
By Michael Weiss {Val Kilmer robbed of an Oscar.}

• Evil Will Always Win Because Good Is Dumb: Episode III
By Michael Weiss {Darth Vader rises in the search for more money.}

• Peer Review: The Aristocrats, In Theory and Practice
By Michael Weiss {You'd rather wait for Godot than the punchline, but that's the point.}

• Larry & Anna & Dan & Alice: Closer, But No Cigar
By Michael Weiss {Mike Nichols' swing and a miss.}

• In The Gloaming: Before Sunset on DVD
By Michael Weiss {Julie Delpy phunks with my heart.}

• Sniffing The Exhalation of Their Own Herd: Bright Young Things
By Michael Weiss {Jazz Age espieglerie made live-action.}

• In Vino Gravitas: Alexander Payne's Knockout New Film Sideways
By Michael Weiss {Worthy of the hype.}

• Michael Moore and Fahrenheit 9/11
By Michael Weiss {He was more convincing as the suicide bomber in Team America.}

• The Dirge Urge: The Arcade Fire's Funeral
By Nic Duquette {Melancholia and the finite sadness.}

• Good Music for People Who Like Bad Music: the new Modest Mouse album is better than their old stuff, but it still sucks.
By Nic Duquette {Nic holds back.}

• Nouvelle Vague: Putting the High-Concept Into "Concept Album"
By Nic Duquette {You get this album when you sign a lease in Williamsburg.}

• Overweight: Polyphonic Spree's Together We're Heavy
By Nic Duquette {Hippies... Hippies all around me... Hippies everywhere.}

• Good Egg: Wilco's A Ghost Is Born
By Nic Duquette {Remarkably unscrambled after the anxiety of follow-up to a legendary album.}

• Taken for Lost, Gone and Unknown for a Long, Long Time: SMiLE and the resurrection of Brian Wilson
By Nic Duquette {And they haven't even started dying yet.}

• The Face of Catholicism
By Orli Sharaby {The magic eye belongs to Jesus.}

• Czechs and Balances: One Year After the EU Moved East
By Orli Sharaby {Mitteleuropa shrugs over continental integration.}

• Shiny, Happy Praguers Clapping Hands
By Orli Sharaby {The latest (two-year-old) Prague fashions: Vaclav Havel brought back the "moist smudge moustache."}

• The Prague Fall: Communism's Death Hasn't Stopped the Self-Inflicted Kind
By Orli Sharaby {The unbearable state of being.}

• The Beverly Hills of the East: Plastic Surgery in Prague
By Orli Sharaby {From DiaMat to Nip/Tuck.}

The Chaff From The Wheatcroft

TrackBack

Old Site Archive

Recent Posts