When a dearly beloved alternative band breaks up ("Moooorrrrisssey! You fuckin' bitch! Let's work it out!"), three forces collude to do something that lurks somewhere between beneficient and evil. Lawyers, labels and aging ex-members of the band put out their B-sides. In the case of Frank Black and the Pixies, the results are more on the beneficient side of the ledger, thanks largely to the efforts of Jeff Price and SpinArt records (which, I should probably confess, are both friends of the family). If you don't know the Pixies, get to know the Pixies. If you already love 'em, then you probably own this and should buy a second copy for your little brother or hip Eastern European penpal who's still only on Echo and the Bunnymen. Never-before-released tracks include "Rock A My Soul," "Here Comes Your Man" and "Oh, There's My Mind."

See other featured Amazon products.

--City Journal
--Crain's NY Business
--Daily News
--The Forward
--Gotham Gazette
--Page Six
--New Yorker
--New York Observer
--New York Magazine
--New York Newsday
--New York Press
--New York Sun
--New York Times
--Wall Street Journal
--The Villager
--Village Voice
--Al Ahram
--The Atlantic
--Boston Globe
--Chronicle Higher Ed
--Chicago Tribune
--Columbia J. Review
--Commentary
--Dissent
--The Economist
--Financial Times
--The Guardian
--Jerusalem Post
--Kurdistan Observer
--LA Times
--London Review
--Me Three
--Mother Jones
--Le Monde Diplomatique
--N+1 Magazine
--National Review
--The Nation
--New Criterion
--New Humanist
--The New Republic
--NY Review of Books
--NYT Book Review
--Paris Review
--Reason
--San Fran Chronicle
--The Telegraph
--Three Penny Review
--Times Lit Supplement
--The Times of India
--Vanity Fair
--Washington Monthly
--Washington Post
--Weekly Standard
--Anne Applebaum
--Martin Amis
--James Bowman
--David Brooks
--E.J. Dionne
--Michael Dirda
--Maureen Dowd
--Thomas Friedman
--Robert George
--Malcolm Gladwell
--Christopher Hitchens
--David Horowitz
--William Shawcross
--Mark Steyn
--Andrew Sullivan
--Jonathan Yardley
--Leon Wieseltier
--James Wolcott
--Arts & Letters Daily
--Alibris
--Apple.com Trailers
--Armavirumque
--Back-In-Print
--Bibliomania
--Chud
--Curbed
--Drudge Report
--Sci Tech Daily
--Gawker
--Gothamist
--IMDB
--InstaPundit
--Media Bistro
--Michael Totten
--Nerve
--New Yorkish
--The Onion
--Plagiarist
--Plastic
--Popfactor
--Savage Love
--Slate
--The Smoking Gun
--Spike Magazine
--Wonkette
--Whatevs
--WSJ Opinion Journal
BOOKS:

-- The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle, by Haruki Murakami {A Japanese detective story/war novel/Kafka rip-off. It's great.}

-- Love, Poverty, and War: Journeys and Essays, by Christopher Hitchens {First drafts of history, second thoughts on received wisdom, versatile meditations on great works of literature -- all by a man who can write about anything.}

-- The Code of the Woosters, by P.G. Wodehouse {The Rise and Fall of the "Black Shorts," and the best of Bertie and Jeeves. You'll need Wodehouse in your life eventually. Start here; you've 89 or so more to go.}

-- The Prophet Armed: Trotsky 1879-1921, by Isaac Deutscher {Magnificient biography finally back in print, along with Volumes II and III. But better start before the revolution -- and Deutscher's conscience -- was betrayed.}

-- Satan: His Psychotherapy and Cure by the Unfortunate Dr. Kassler, J.S.P.S., by Jeremy Leven {A sorely forgotten modern classic. Leven has since swapped the galley for the camera, directing such keepers as Don Juan Demarco and The Legend of Bagger Vance. Satan has relapsed.}

-- Colossus, by Niall Ferguson {Why the U.S. can't hack neo-imperialism, much to Niall's chagrin.}

-- Reflections on a Ravaged Century, by Robert Conquest {Don't even try to have an opinion about the twentieth century without reading him.}

-- Scoop, by Evelyn Waugh {One of the funniest books, ever. Shrinks the remainder of the "innocent abroad" genre to the vanishing point.}

-- Put Out More Flags, by Evelyn Waugh {Lapidary prose on the frisson between the wars. Basil Seal riding low before he rides again; Auden and Isherwood lampooned as "Parnsip and Pimpernell."}

-- The Complete Stories of Evelyn Waugh, by E.W. {Nasty, brutish and short, in short form.}

-- The Origins of Postmodernity, by Perry Anderson {Terrific writer from the London Review of Books and New Left Review, who ought to be more famous than he is, tackles lucidly the abstruse bloodhound gang -- from Habermas to Jameson -- of Theory.}

-- Saul Bellow: Novels 1944-1953: Dangling Man, The Victim, and The Adventures of Augie March, [Library of Congress Hardcover Edition] {Look: it's his world, we all just live in it.}

-- The Counterlife, by Philip Roth {How Portnoy learned to stop complaining and write a brilliant postmodern novel.}

-- Rise of the Vulcans, by James Mann {Probably the only low-blood pressure source on Bush's brain trust. Valuable for charting the progression of neo-neo-conservatism, and how Cheney and Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz contravened, and then dismantled, the Kissinger realpolitik foreign policy machine.}

-- Money, by Martin Amis {Forget Bonfire and Psycho. It took the English author of The Moronic Inferno: And Other Visits to America to effectively chew up the Reagan era -- largely by reminding us that it was also the Thatcher era. A fine lesson in history repeating, too: Di and Charles were TV's original Ben and J. Lo; the Self-on-Massi sex tape is where Paris (if she can read) might have learned her stuff; and the cavalier cash flow in this soft-boiled checkbook who-dun-it tale rivals that of any West Coast dotcom monkey a decade later.}

-- The War Against Cliché and Experience, by Martin Amis {If Amis kept on doing what he did in his award-winning collection of critical essays, James Wood would lose more hair. It's saying quite a lot that his non-fiction exceeds his fiction. Experience is by far the best memoir to appear in the last decade: a more muscular Speak, Memory, it's a midlife nostalgia trip pureed out of chronology, though somehow more cohesive than a stream-of-consciousness hodgepodge. Guaranteed to pluck at the coronary sinews for anyone dealing with the loss of a father.}

-- Lucky Jim, by Kingsley Amis {A comic genius on academia, Amis is the pitch-perfect representative of postwar male rage. None of that Angry Young Man, stuff, though. His apoplexy is hilarious at any age. The faces: "crazy peasant," "sex life in ancient Rome," "shot-in-the-back." Moo, by Jane Smiley, The Straight Man, by Richard Russo and everything by David Lodge seem impossible without this Platonic key ring to rule them all, and on the campus, bind them.}

-- The Letters of Kingsley Amis, edited by Zachary Leader {Pay close attention to the letters to Philip Larkin -- together with Larkin's Collected Letters (try eBay, sorry), these constitute the documentation of one of the most rewarding and hilarious literary friendships to date. Amuse yourself by guessing the exact page number where Kingsley abandons Communism.}

-- The Stories of Vladimir Nabokov, by V. Nabokov {I'm way underqualified, with my mean years on the planet, to state critical opinion. Still in larval adulation, which I understand is a longterm afflication. Read Anthony Lane's review in Nobody's Perfect. And M. Amis on Nabokov in toto in the prenominate War Against Cliché. And get a dictionary.}

--The Moral Obligation to Be Intelligent, edited by Leon Wieseltier {The style is dated and stilted, but the insights are not. Especially worthwhile: the Orwell essay, the Mansfield Park burn, and "The Situation of the American Intellectual at the Present Time" (i.e. "What Do They Know of America, Who Only the Upper West Side Know?"}

-- The Irresponsible Self: On Laughter and the Novel, by James Wood {The bling to Dale Peck's blah.}

-- A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again, by David Foster Wallace {Self-indulgence and the consequences of a missing-in-action editor never had it so good. The state fair, cruise ship and TV pieces are the best. But also read the Lynch essay: it'll make you want to re-watch Blue Velvet, which you can conveniently buy below.}

-- Collected Poems, by Philip Larkin (edited by Anthony Thwaite) {Poetus mirabilis and, after Auden, the occupant of a near empty Hall of Metrical Wonders in the Postwar Anglophone wing of the museum. Master ironist and curmudgeon you least want to bludgeon.}

-- Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World, by Margaret Macmillan {A dryly told account of global dust-settling after what was then myopically known as "the Great War." Explores the follies of Wilson, Lloyd George and Clemenceau, which helped bring about WWII.}

-- Doomed, Bourgeois, In Love: Essays on the Films of Whit Stillman, edited by Mark Henrie {Discreet charms of the bourgeoisie given the scholarly treatment by the kinds of New Criterion-y people who liked Grosse Pointe Blank because John Cusack's assassin refused to unionize. Don't let the pedantry taint your judgment of Stillmania, though.}

-- Reading Lolita in Tehran: A Memoir in Books, by Azar Nafisi {A beautiful paean to Western literature from an Eastern scholar living under Islamic statism; the Gatsby trial and Jane Austen dance chapters are particularly enjoyable.}

-- The Persian Mirror: The Elusive Face of Iran, by Elaine Sciolino {For those with short odds on the next war of choice.}

-- Nobody's Perfect: Writings from The New Yorker, by Anthony Lane {He needs to stop it with the creepy drooling over Natalie Portman, but Lane is still the best around for losing it at the movies.}

-- The Collected Short Stories of Roald Dahl {Adult stories, less like his children’s stuff than what O. Henry would have been like if his ironic plot twists had involved wife-swapping, cannibalism, or turning infants into superhuman bee-monsters. Might be fun for the kid who never reads, actually.}

-- The Chicago Manual of Style, by the University of Chicago Press Staff {and the ghost of Allan Bloom.}

-- The Brothers Karamazov, by F. Dostoevsky, translated by Pevear and Volokhonsky {Incest! Murder! Theodicy!}

-- Collected Non-Fictions, by Jorge Luis Borges {A prose impresario short-winded enough to keep beside the toilet -- especially if your john is in a labrynith that transcends spacetime.}

-- Love and Hydrogen: New and Selected Stories, by John Shepard {Stories narrated by John Ashcroft, John Entwistle, Nazi rocket riders, the creature from the black lagoon, and others.}

-- My Life and Hard Times, by James Thurber {Think of David Sedaris, in turn of the century Columbus, Ohio. And without the gay schtick, or even a pretense at respect for his family.}

ALBUMS:

-- You Are the Quarry, by Morrissey {He's back! And almost paid off the deficit incurred by Maladjusted. A few gripes: "America Is Not the World" never fulfills the promise of its title. It's an unwieldy blunderbuss, not a rapier -- and the use of "hamburger" as synecdoche for our national obesity problem is a new hackneyed low for the Oscar Wilde of the microphone. "I Have Forgiven Jesus" ultimately works, but I can't help but feel that that one was just too easy.}

-- Weightlifting, by The Trashcan Sinatras {Remember them from your college radio daze? A brisk homecoming track, appositely named "Welcome Back" ("Everyone survived / Everyone's alive!" -- well, thank goodness) kicks off this highly accomplished return to musicmaking for an alt-pop band that shouldn't have stayed away so long.}

-- Strange Bird, by Augie March {With a name like Augie, it has to be good. It is. Analogs fail me.}

-- Evergreen, by Echo and the Bunnymen {Best 80's Band Comeback Album. No contest.}

-- Mermaid Avenue, by Billy Bragg and Wilco {A fucking classic. Ukanian bloke Billy Bragg manages to capture the rhythms of dustbowl Americana better than Dylan -- the obvious disciple/witch doctor to perform a Woody Guthrie resurrection -- ever could do. All lyrics by Guthrie, music by Bragg and Wilco.}

-- Don't Try This at Home, by Billy Bragg {Most people who hear Mermaid Avenue invariably want more of the man who brought it to them. This is Bragg's most "accessible" solo album, though not without the politics that's defined his career. "Accident Waiting to Happen" is a punk snarl against cultural fascism.}

-- Galore, by Kirsty MacColl {May this earth angel charm the knickers off the winged principalities. MacColl died a few years ago in a boating accident, but I can only imagine how well-attended her funeral must have been by the panoply of musicians guilty of "sampling" her Celtic nightingale voice. This album consists mainly of covers, but that's more than all right for someone generous enough to never ask for top billing, despite consistently stealing the show.}

-- These Are the Vistas, by the Bad Plus {"Smells Like Teen Spirit," the jazz standard. No kidding. Comes off not just better than you'd expect, but brilliantly.}

-- SMiLE, by Brian Wilson {Reviewed here. Check to the right.}

-- The Soft Bulletin, by the Flaming Lips {And the hard singing voice to take, but worth it anyway.}

-- It Takes a Nation of Millions to Hold Us Back, by Public Enemy {More complicated rhymes and denser loops than have been on the radio before or sense, plus the guy with the big clock.}

-- Who Will Cut Our Hair When We're Gone?, by the Unicorns {Morbid, tinny, wildly innovative and beautiful.}

-- Loaded: Fully Loaded Edition, by the Velvet Underground {Funny, Lou Reed doesn’t usually look this happy. Must be Laurie Anderson's doing.}

-- Traitor In Our Midst, by the Country Gazette {What you always thought bluegrass was supposed to sound like.}

-- The Modern Lovers, by the Modern Lovers {Speaking of Lou Reed, remember the guy with the guitar who gets shot in Something About Mary? Imagine that guy redoing "White Light/White Heat," but with lyrics about aging with dignity and eschewing drugs. That sounds like a snark, but it’s actually the SAM guy, and John Cale produced.}

-- The Queen Is Dead, by The Smiths {I can't believe you don't own this already. The summa of the Moz/Marr collaboration.}

-- The Boatman's Call, by Nick Cave {The Prince of Darkness may have been afraid to board a plane after 9/11, but this "New Testament" sound is proof of moisture's sustainability in Hell. "Into My Arms" is sweet enough to play your girlfriend on Valentine's Day, leaving the oldie-but-dreary "Deanna" to blast at her when she dumps you.}

-- No Cities Left, by The Dears {The lead singer cried when Morrissey asked the band to open on the "You Are the Quarry" tour. That kind of gone-to-pieces sentimentalism can only lead one place: straight down. Get 'em while they're new and good.}

-- The Boy With the Arab Strap, by Belle and Sebastian {Might as well order that black V-neck sweater, Rimbaud's Collected Poems, while you're at it. "Theoretical" bisexuality not a requisite, despite what angry twee detractors say.}

FILMS & TV:

-- Cannibal! The Musical. {Trey Parker's college thesis, a feature-length movie musical about the only American ever convicted of cannibalism. Not for all markets, but better than most of his later stuff.}

-- Before Sunset, directed by Richard Linklater {The sequel that doesn't feel like one. Why thirtysomethings who chat are more interesting than twentysomethings who do likewise. Some sluggish moments, but all made up for by a luminous final scene that made me fall in love with Julie Delpy once more. Bet it made Anthony Lane "spill [his] Sprite" again, too.}

-- Collateral, directed by Michael Mann {Tom Cruise has always been a hard-working, as opposed to naturally gifted, actor. This part was his pension come early. Michael Mann is the Richard Avedon of the moving Los Angeles image. And Jamie Foxx ain't too shabby, either.}

-- The Unbelievable Truth, directed by Hal Hartley {Surreal-ish debut from a master indy filmmaker and satirist. Yes, that is Edie Falco as the diner waitress.}

-- Henry Fool, directed by Hal Hartley {Hartley's masterpiece. Probably the only movie about writers that's ever worked. Barton Fink, anyone?}

-- Metropolitan, directed by Whit Stillman {Downwardly mobile 60's college jet set. Making a film about this demographic is like trying to play matchmaker to a Republican leper in Northampton, Mass. That the dialogue (and it's all dialogue) stays liquid-tongued is a monument to Stillman's talent... dare I say, genius?}

-- Barcelona, directed by Whit Stillman {Anti-Americanism when it was more funny than scary. The "subtext" speech belongs in Bartlett's. The DVD commentary is, as someone from the earlier film might say, "priceless."}

-- The Last Days of Disco, directed by Whit Stillman {An assault on 70's cliche in the best possible way -- the anti-54. Also known as Yuppies: A Defense. Chloe Sevigny gives grace to the one night stand, instead of head to Vincent Gallo.}

-- Mr. Jealousy, directed by Noah Baumbach {Who wouldn't hunt down the ex-boyfriends of Annabella Sciorra? Eric Stoltz had fewer difficulties with girls in Mask. Chris Eigeman from the Stillman flicks swaps Mayflower pedigree for facial hair (modelled on David Foster Wallace's Infinite Jest jacket photo), to varying degrees of success. An underrated romantic comedy, but don't say I didn't warn you: this film may engender awkward relationship conversation. It may also plant supersleuth-stalker seeds in frail men's heads. Or so I've heard.}

-- Blue Velvet, directed by David Lynch {So many epigones, so far from this mark.}

-- Father Ted: The Holy Trinity {BBC TV series about three priests on an island. No, not that kind of series, you sick fuck.}

-- The Office - The Complete Collection (First And Second Series Plus Special) {Creator, writer, director and star Rick Gervais used to manage Suede and now this. That's enough laurels for one lifetime. He can die now.}

-- Arrested Development - Season One {To think that Teen Wolf Too was just a glimpse of Jason Bateman's potential.}

07/06/05 - 09/30/05
05/05/05 - 07/05/05
03/31/05 - 05/04/05
2/24/05 - 3/30/05
1/16/05 - 2/22/05
12/3/04 - 1/15/05
9/1/04 - 12/2/04
7/14/04 - 8/31/04
6/23/04 - 7/13/04
  Wednesday, May 4, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

It's the Stupidity, Economists: Part III... I ripped on Paul Krugman Monday for deceitfully arguing against Bush's proposed reduction in the rate of Social Security benefit increases; I did the same to John Tierney yesterday for pretending he lives in Chile. Today I want to make my own points about the benefit cuts.

Bush proposed to index benefits to prices for high-end earners, fixing their benefits at a constant inflation-adjusted income. Lower income workers would continue to have their benefits indexed to wages, as they are now. Wages traditionally increase more quickly than prices. People between the extremes would see their increases indexed to some sort of average between the two rates.

The press jumped on this proposal by calling it a "benefit cut," which is kind of true, but not in the way most people understand a "cut." Decades from now, it means middle- and upper-class earners will get less than the law currently anticipates giving them, but at no point will benefits be reduced from what they were the previous year. The increases will simply be smaller.

Once people got that straight, the idea that's been bouncing around the echo chamber has been the idea that this is all a plot to undermine the popularity of Social Security in the long run. Right now Social Security is a bad deal for the middle class, but if it were an even worse deal, it would somehow cease to be popular. (e.g. This Slate essay, titled "How to Make the Middle Class Hate Social Security") But even if this were Bush's motives, wouldn't it make more sense to infuriate both poor and middle-class people (by increasing the payroll tax rate or raising the retirement age) or the wealthy and powerful (by raising the cap on the taxes)? Or is the suggestion that we keep the program as it is and run a deficit? Considering deficits are the basis for financing every other government program, especially the military, I don't see why nobody has suggested doing this. It's not like we aren't looking the other way on Medicare.

When I read these criticisms of the Bush-Pozen plan, I don't understand why nobody is worrying about the poor. It's taken as given that wages rise faster than prices, so benefits for the poor will rise faster than benefits for the wealthy. But the reason we have wage-indexed benefits now is because in the late '70s prices were rising faster than wages -- and the government switched to a wage index to slow the increase in benefits. Ironically.

So in times of prosperity, or normal or even tepid growth, the poor will see their benefits rise faster than inflation. Great! But in times of stagflation, prices rise quite a bit faster than wages. The wealthy will see their benefits stay at the same inflation-adjusted level, so that part of their retirement income will keep pace with a surging cost of living. But the pension of the poor will lag behind the cost of living, possibly by quite a bit. And because the other half of stagflation is a stagnant economy, things will have to get pretty bad before they can get better. This is what happened in the late '70s and early '80s. Advances in economic theory have made stagflation less likely -- but not impossible.

So this bifurcated indexing would give the middle-class a smaller, but more stable, Social Security benefit. The poor would get a benefit that increases more rapidly in good times, but actually contracts when they need it most. The poor would still come out ahead on average. But those who depend on Social Security and expect it to keep up with inflation could experience real hardship if the economy were to really tank the way it did during the '70s oil shocks. Instead of worrying about what Joe Suburb is going to think about a price index, we might consider what could happen if, or when, the economy tanks again to the poorest seniors.

Tomorrow I'll tie this all together (and justify this title) with some remarks on the private retirement plans the government already gives you, and why privatized Social Security might be a better deal for retirees for precisely the opposite reasons being offered by the Republican party. --Nic Duquette [link]


Al Qaeda "General" Nabbed... Abu Farraj al-Libbi, the number three guy, was caught in South Waziristan (sort of like a less "over" South Hampton of Sharia law to Kabul's once bustling Gotham).

Al-Libbi helped orchestrate one of the assassination attempts on Musharraf, as well as the execution of WSJ reporter Danny Pearl. This comes a day or two after a memo to Zarqawi was intercepted in Iraq, claiming a lowered "morale" among jihadists. It's not too much to assume there'll be an assassination attempt -- hopefully just an attempt -- on a senior Iraqi official in the coming weeks. This morale then can only drop even further as "the base" slowly and methodically chips away at itself. --Michael Weiss [link]


That's It: Dan Savage for Secretary of Health and Human Services... I'm not kidding. What the fuck did Donna Shalala ever do in comparison to this man? This week someone writes in to suggest that Bill Frist get a new use for his ever-workable last name, a la Rick Santorum. But Savage replies that this game, if kept up, would exhaust itself way too quickly.

I don't know about you, BISD, but I don't ever want to hear my boyfriend say, "Stick your dobson in my scalia, big bauer, and musgrave the gates out of me until I ratzinger." Could any man maintain an erection after hearing that?

And as for Bill Frist, yeah, he's a freakin' asswipe. But any attempt to attach his name to a sex act will only confuse people. If you tell someone you're into "fristing," they're going to think you're a fist-fucker with a speech impediment. And, really, Bill Frist doesn't need my help ruining his good name. He's doing a good job of that all by himself.

--Michael Weiss [link]


Shhh... Speaking of the Onion and, you know, neocons: "I Can't Stand It When Jews Talk During Movies."

I sure didn't pay $10 to listen to a group of twits talk back to the screen like those obnoxious Jewish robots from Mystery Science Theater 3000! And apparently, "God's chosen people" weren't selected based on their ability to follow plotlines. No wonder they wandered the desert for so many years—they can't even watch a Vin Diesel movie without getting lost. --Michael Weiss [link]


The Public Interest No More... First PR folded up a few years ago, now PI's gone too... Those who really believe neoconservatives are of a single mind on everything and rule the world oligarchically will be reminded of that Onion headline: "Starbucks To Begin Sinister 'Phase Two' Of Operation." Hell, even 'Phase Two' is outmoded, given what Kristol & co. hath already wrought. Or so plenty regularly affirm in op-ed columns, which read as if they were hatched by some uni-brained Politburo of opinion.

Yeah, well plenty ought to read these two pieces. The first is by Grand Moph Tarkin himself, the second is by the cuddlier, fuzzier-headed Nathan Glazer.

Neocons: Fellow-Traveling the Donner Party Way Since 1972. --Michael Weiss [link]


Tuesday, May 3, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

In the Company of Company Men... Glengarry Glen Ross is back on Broadway and Ben Brantley plotzes all over the Theatre page of the Times about it.

This transfixingly acted production, which opened last night at the Royale Theater, leaves you with a case of happy jitters that may keep you up hours past bedtime. But what's a little lost sleep when you've had the chance to see and hear a dream-team ensemble, including Alan Alda and Liev Schreiber, pitching fastball Mamet dialogue with such vigor, expertise and pure love for the athletics of acting?

So unwised-up and ebullient for a man whose profession afflicts more pain and human suffering than dentistry.

I once got to play Shelley "the Machine" Levine in a very independent production of it in college. I should say "re-imagining" of it: half women, half men. I hated this idea at the time because it seemed to be following a too common trend of "updating" plays that already managed enjoy that rare reward of being both timely and timeless. It wasn't until I saw MacBeth set in the Caribbean with full Carmen Miranda regalia that I realized, so long as the dialogue remains untouched, they can try all they want to add the turg to drama; perfection still abides. Anyway, our thing came off amateurish but not because of the gender split, which meshed scarily well with the metaphoric emasculation of the characters it was possible to literally emasculate. This was 1999, when Eve Ensler was using one pair of lips to rap about the other, so I guess I shouldn't have been that surprised.

Speaking of Eve, have you seen this? (I picked the worst day to write about going laissez-faire on academia.) --Michael Weiss [link]


Yeah, Cause Who'd Want to Snatch a Fugly Little Bugger?... Parents keep a better eye on their pretty kids than they do on their ugly ones. --Michael Weiss [link]
It's the Stupidity, Economists: Part II... I attacked Paul Krugman here for using deceptive arguments against Bush's benefit slowdown. Today I'm going to attack John Tierney for doing the same thing in favor of privatized accounts.

Any time a NYT columnist calls himself a "control group," I hope a red flag goes up in your mind. Tierney compares his non-privatized Social Security pension with the one his friend Pablo from Chile is going to get. Chile privatized their pension plan in 1981. Tierney claims to control for income disparity between himself and Pablo, and concludes that the privatized system gives back roughly a third of American social security. The implication is that privatized plans make for three times the retirement.

But there's one problem with Tierney's "experiment." The test subject and control group are in two very different countries. Here is a chart of the S&P 500 since January 1981 and the Santiago IPSA index since 1989:

Chile has been growing at an astonishing pace in the past twenty years. It's easier for a developing nation to grow at a fast pace than a developed one -- I've heard it compared to cyclists drafting off the lead biker. As Chile's economy has boomed and its financial markets have matured, its stock market has exploded. Even giving the S&P an eight-year head start, the IPSA's growth on a percentage basis has been triple the S&P.

This comparison would be more accurate if I had data on the Chilean markets going back to '81, when the shift to private pensions happened. But I can't find it. Since financial markets have an upward bias, the gap between Chile and the USA growth is probably even bigger. But maybe not. If anybody knows where I can get better Chilean stock numbers, let me know. --Nic Duquette [link]


Signing Your Shame at Page Six... To read a thousand and one different ways of describing Lindsay Lohan's giant tits, you now need to dish on annual income, email and -- worst of all -- name. --Michael Weiss [link]
Born in the USA, Invented on the Glossy Page... A terrific up-down-and-back-up-again profile of Bruce Springsteen by a fan who, without bitterness or guilt, has let the scales fall from his eyes. The imago of The Boss may have faded (because it never deserved to exist), but Stephen Metcalf still hears America singing:

By 1978, and the release of Darkness on the Edge of Town, the endearing Jersey wharf rat in Springsteen had been refined away. In its place was a majestic American simpleton with a generic heartland twang, obsessed with cars, Mary, the Man, and the bitterness between fathers and sons. Springsteen has been augmenting and refining that persona for so long now that it's hard to recall its status, not only as an invention, but an invention whose origin wasn't even Bruce Springsteen. For all the po-faced mythic resonance that now accompanies Bruce's every move, we can thank Jon Landau, the ex-Rolling Stone critic who, after catching a typically seismic Springsteen set in 1974, famously wrote, "I saw rock and roll future, and its name is Bruce Springsteen."

Metcalf goes on to quote, in concession to the sprigs of authenticity still rising up out of the acid-washed "roots," an excerpt of Bruce's speech at the Rock n' Roll Hall of Fame induction ceremony for U2. It (the excerpt) amounts to "I'm rich and I've sold out, and by saying that I can't possibly mean it." An interesting counterpoint here would be Bono's speech at Bruce's induction ceremony a few years ago. The liquid-tongued Irishman gave an unforgettable paean to the Bard of Underdogs. The line that was probably engineered to stick in people's minds sure as hell stuck in mine: "We called him 'The Boss,' but this was wrong. He worked for us." Yeah, yeah. "With us" is closer to the mark. Nothing could have sold without people eager and willing to buy.

Still, the bathos isn't quite that asphyxiating. We needn't add another broken hero to the already pretty jammed highway because it's always been about the music. The legend's allowed to be bullshit. --Michael Weiss [link]


A Liberal Academe... I recently joked here that gay marriage was the only remaining uniquely "liberal" cause. I have been corrected. Conservatives in the academy are probably not weighing in at sociological investigations like the one below. This is a real email sent out, unfortunately, by the college I graduated from just a year ago:

Date: 02 May 2005 20:05:58 EDT
From: Women in Leadership
Subject: "WHY DO YOU ALWAYS LEAVE THE TOILET SEAT UP?"
To: (Recipient list suppressed)


*******WOMEN IN LEADERSHIP******
TOMORROW 6:00-7:00PM
Morrison Commons, Rockefeller Center

<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>

"WHY DO YOU ALWAYS LEAVE THE TOILET SEAT UP?"
Questions Women Have for Men

A chat with Sociology Professor Michael I. Borer

Come participate in a roundtable discussion where you get to ask the questions you've always wanted to.
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
--Nic Duquette [link]

Monday, May 2, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

A Rittle Ornery... The White House press secretary, characteristically a warm glob of statesmanlike phlegm, was pushed to the vituperative max today after North Korea launched a "test" missile into the Sea of Japan.

With the language used by both sides sharpening, Mr. Card denounced the North Koreans as "bullies" and called their leader, Kim Jong Il, "not a good person."

Ooh, tungsten sharp! How many peasants have to be sacrificed just so Andy Card can dispense with the euphemistic nice-nice and tell like it is, huh?

His comment came a day after North Korea called President Bush a "philistine" and a "hooligan."

Almost enough to give up the struggle right there. Soccer has hooligans, for chrissake.

The only one not pulling his punches is... Take a wild guess. --Michael Weiss [link]


It's the Stupidity, Economists: Part I... Krugman (PoKro?) has gone back to Social Security after promising to deal with health care for a month or so. This is too bad, because Krugman was making good points on health care, even if some of his statistics were misleadingly framed. His latest on Social Security is deliberately deceptive, however. Here we go:

Sure enough, a close look at President Bush's proposal for "progressive price indexing" of Social Security puts the lie to claims that it's a plan to increase benefits for the poor and cut them for the wealthy. In fact, it's a plan to slash middle-class benefits; the wealthy would barely feel a thing.

Under current law, low-wage workers receive Social Security benefits equal to 49 percent of their wages before retirement. Under the Bush scheme, that wouldn't change. So benefits for the poor would be maintained, not increased.

No, no, no. This is a common deception used for political ends, whereby one party can brag that they increased spending while the other party claims they decreased it. Nobody's benefits will be going down under this Bush plan. None. Nobody's. No spending will be cut. None.

Here's what's actually been suggested by the president. Benefits will continue to be increased every year, but the rate at which they are increased will be less for wealthier earners than the rate at which they currently increase. Right now, SS benefits are indexed to wages, which usually rise faster than prices in an expanding economy. It hasn't always been this way. During the Carter era of high inflation, prices briefly grew much faster than wages. At that time, the switch was made from price indexing to wage indexing because the government apparently thought that trend would continue for a while. But it makes more sense to tag benefits to prices, so that what your pension buys now it can keep buying in the future.

So what Bush is essentially prosposing is to keep the extra-generous wage indexing for those who depend most on Social Security, while adopting the less-generous index for those who depend on it least, and everybody in between would sort of split the difference. If you're a member of the middle class, planning to retire after 2015, and you've ever actually estimated your Social Security benefits and used them to plan your retirement out to the dollar, you have a right to be angry. But I'm not sure more than five people in this entire country have done all those things.

What Krugman would prefer is to raise the cap on wages subject to Social Security taxes, currently capped at $90,000. This would be a transfer from the wealthy to the middle class, instead of from the middle class to the poor. I'm morally comfortable with either option, but Krugman's argument that reducing the benefits to the middle class will make Social Security vulnerable in the future seems pretty far out. He may be right, but giving the very wealthy an incentive to do away with the program by making them pay for virtually all of it sounds like a better recipe for electoral evisceration than giving the middle class slightly less free money.

I'll have more to say about this over the next couple days, including what's wrong with Tierney's pro-privatization column, why Bush's plan really could screw the poor, and an argument for privatization nobody's really talked about much. --Nic Duquette [link]


There's Something About Laura... She smokes, she reads Stoppard and McEwan, and she deftly incorporates horse cum jokes into Correspondents dinners. Three words: Dowd. Bush. Jell-O. (Because otherwise the terrorists have already won.)

The only thing better than her schtick is the Washington Times' coverage of it.

"One night, after George went to bed, Lynne Cheney, [Secretary of State] Condi Rice, [Bush adviser] Karen Hughes and I went to Chippendales," she said, referring to a strip club where women tuck cash into male dancers' skimpy thongs. "I wouldn't even mention it except [Supreme Court Justices] Ruth Ginsberg and Sandra Day O'Connor saw us there. I won't tell you what happened, but Lynne's Secret Service code name is now 'Dollar Bill.'"

Oh, come on. Even the Moonies know about Chippendales. Didn't they do a "mass wedding" there once? --Michael Weiss [link]


The Apotheosis of Fan Fic... Check out this indy Star Wars movie called "Revelations." A bunch of fans made it with desktop CGI and a $20K budget. (Slate has the in-depth story.) Because of copyright laws the poor hyperdriven nerdlettes can't ever profit from their vision. A shame, too, because this is stylistically better than what Lucas has been putting out since the millennium.

Although, fanboy extraordinaire Kevin Smith has seen Episode III and thinks it's sweet, dark redemption for four hours of pop cultural life we can't have back. --Michael Weiss [link]


Least Existentially Necessary NYT Headline So Far This Week... Scientists Say Red Speck Is Indeed Huge New Planet. Put that in your cosmic significance pipe and smoke it. Someone over at "Science" has got a bad case of the Mondays. --Michael Weiss [link]
Horizontally Integrated... I've said before that Paris Hilton is going to be Lynne Cheney in twenty years. Someone, somewhere is going to get caught wondering if she wasn't that Internet porn sylph way back when, as she testifies before a Senate oversight committee about the perils of bottle service or human cloning or whatever. I mean, where does a twinkling little star without a gag reflex have to go from here? Either she chops up Bijou Phillips and then heads for the White House, or it's the smoother transition from fabulous Motorola anarchy to "sensible" Ann Klein culture. Looks like a twit, sounds like a synergist. Meet the new boss:

She said that she was pursued by dozens of talent agencies, but chose Endeavor because "they know how to do branding and they're really smart." Over an early dinner of Chilean sea bass and salad at the Cipriani in SoHo, Ms. Hilton said she intended to model her career after those of the moguls Sean Combs and Donald Trump. "Puffy is a genius," she said of Mr. Combs. "He does everything. Music. Clothing. I totally look up to him and Donald Trump because he's built this whole empire - hotels, casinos, resorts, a television show." --Michael Weiss [link]


Saturday, April 30, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

Peeled Magnolias... Who is Jennifer Wilbanks? White, southern, suburban chick, tall, pretty and scheduled to be married Saturday in Duluth, Georgia. Instead, she disappeared a few days ago and was thought to have been kidnapped or worse. What in the world was going in this country? The "news" topped the headlines each day and our media wizards were sure sinister plottings were afoot.

As it turns out, she's just another runaway bride (in this case, literally, as she had gone out for a jog when last heard from). Why did she take a bus all the way to Vegas? Why did she then go on to Albuquerque? Who gives a shit? This never should have been national news in the first place and now it turns out to be a non-story entirely. Though it appears Gore Vidal was wrong when he said of Duluth: "Love or loathe it, you can never leave it or lose it." --Mark Grueter [link]


The Man of Vyra on the Man of La Mancha... Planning to celebrate the 600th anniversary of Cervantes' masterpiece by actually reading it for the first time? You could do a lot worse, says James Fenton, than to consult Nabokov's literalist but droll lectures on the Don.

Among the numerous misconceptions about Don Quixote is the idea that the knight never wins any of his contests: he always ends up with a drubbing. But that is not true at all.

In one lecture Nabokov goes through the contests one by one, and scores them, finding that the tally is even: the Don wins as many contests as he loses. "Moreover," says Nabokov, "in each of the two parts of the book the score is also even: 13 to 13 and 7 to 7, respectively. This perfect balance of victory and defeat is very amazing in what seems like such a disjointed and haphazard book. It is due to a secret sense of writing, the harmonizing intuition of the artist."

Something numerologically signficant about that scoring, too. --Michael Weiss [link]


The Clashsky... The state of post-Soviet Russian punk? Better educated, more grown up than the Anglophone original stuff. Still just as raw and angry and politically driven. Putin's got his work cut out for him with these Uncle Joe Strummers nipping at his heels:

PTVP's full name means "Last Tanks in Paris," a play on the title of a 1972 Bernardo Bertolucci film, as well as a reference to the French student uprising of 1968 and the suppressed "Prague Spring" of the same year. Formed in Vyborg in 1996, the band is now one of Russia's last remaining outposts of uncompromising, politically conscious music.

Nikonov described his most recent album, "2084," as an album about love, despite its Orwellian title. He described this as a deliberate move to distant himself from political groups, mostly left-wing in nature, who liked PTVP's stance and wanted its fan base to support them.

"They wanted to make me their flag. But I don't want to be anybody's flag, so we intentionally made an album of love songs," he said. --Michael Weiss [link]


Zakaria on Friedman's New Book... In the course of reviewing Thomas Friedman's new book on globalism, Fareed Zakaria, the conservative Indian editor of Newsweek, uses the following expressions: "schticks" and "From your mouth to God's ears." For someone without an MA in economics, I give you my best-guess vindication of Friedman's thesis right there. Still, the infelicity of ToFro's style can't be ignored even by his neoliberal boosters:

In one of Friedman's classic anecdote-as-explanation shticks, he recounts that one of his best friends is an illustrator. The friend saw his business beginning to dry up as computers made routine illustrations easy to do, and he moved on to something new. He became an illustration consultant, helping clients conceive of what they want rather than simply executing a drawing. Friedman explains this in Friedman metaphors: the friend's work began as a chocolate sauce, was turned into a vanilla commodity, through upgraded skills became a special chocolate sauce again, and then had a cherry put on top. All clear?

Crystal. Like a Waterford vase manufactured in Addis Ababa, telemarketed in Karachi and shipped... oh, never mind. --Michael Weiss [link]


Friday, April 29, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

Oh, Peggy... It's a damn shame Mary McCarthy and Dorothy Parker are no longer with us (although, if nail-growth occurs after death, then the jury's still out on the viability of the retractable claw.) What I wouldn't give to have either one's feline counterstrike to this pious puppy tail-wag from Peggy Noonan:

"Those who are pursuing John Paul II's canonization, please note: his first miracle is Benedict XVI."

Had she let out a ripsnorting fart during a silent interim at Midnight Mass, that would have still been less embarassing than the above sentence.

Speaking of embarassment, the Wall Street Journal sketch artist must have been watching Three's Company re-runs on Nick-at-Nite. He make Benedict XVI look like a hornier Mr. Roper. ("Damn it, Helen, I'm giving the eucharist.")

But don't just take my word for it. Check out James Wolcott today, in Gore Vidal Overdrive Mode. The next best thing to the Unvirgin Mary appearing in your morning bailly, or Dot running vicious circles round OpinionPage. --Michael Weiss [link]


Eagleton on Wittgenstein... He went on more "Razor's Edge experiences" than even a German philosopher should be allowed in a single lifetime. The propositions in his only book, The Logico-Philosophicus Tractatus, came as a complete mind-fuck to the not-easily-discomfited Bertrand Russell. And then there was that whole fireplace rumble with Karl Popper...

Is it any wonder that a big bundle of sturm und drang like Ludwig Wittengenstein remains the 20th-century philosopher of choice for novelists, filmmakers and artists?

The Mancunian T-Bird does his thang in TLS. I wish he'd cut it out already with the summary explanations of the too-obvious. This is becoming a bad habit in his book reviews lately, probably his way of overcompensating for these breezy, perspicuous After Theory times of ours:

Two excellent pieces in this volume, by Bernard Harrison and John Gibson, show us how the apparent choice between this “textualism”, and the idea of language as mimetic or referential, is a false one. In Gibson’s appealing view, literary fictions engage with the world by providing us with a kind of archive of the standards and criteria we need in order to narrate our own way in it. Wittgenstein himself observed that nothing is more important for understanding the concepts we have than constructing fictitious ones.

Got that? You read books because they "relate" to "human experiences." Oh, and the proper study of mankind is man. --Michael Weiss [link]


Thursday, April 28, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

In Defense of Happy Slapping... The latest "craze" in the UK involves teens using cell phone cams to record their friends slapping other people in the face. Just one slap, delivered randomly, but one that creates quite a shock. These impish kids then post the footage online, for shits and giggles.

In America, the news has been met with alarm and despondency (stern voices, shaking heads, raised arms) comparable to the proliferation of missing children in Florida. Just more evidence of how far astray our debauched youth has gone. Now, I agree that it's simply wrong to hit girls, but other than that it strikes me as something that might've come out of Benny Hill or Monty Python. Boys will be boys. I wouldn't want to be hit of course, but really, is this sort of nonsense newsworthy? --Mark Grueter [link]


The Energy Policy... I wonder whether President Bush timed his announcement of a new energy policy so the formation of an Iraqi government would drown it out in the news. That's a shame, because if he pulls it off this policy would be the biggest geopolitical and environmental achievement of his presidency. He's calling for bigger tax breaks on hybrid cars, more clean coal technology, more natural gas, more nuclear power, as well as stopgap expansions of oil refinery capacity. Getting half of these through Congress with adequate funding would be great. Getting all of it would be blockbuster. Because Bush is proposing to give this technology away to developing nations as well, he could (1) single-handedly do more for global warming than Kyoto could even imagine, (2) drive down energy dependence on foreign oil, undermining dozens of despots and their terrorist cells, (3) set the stage for a largely nuclear-energy/fuel-cell economy, which has virtually no environmental or geopolitical cost as long as the reactors are kept safe and clean.

It's even more astonishing to consider he's doing this contrary to the desires of several powerful interest groups, including the oil industry, the US auto industry, and his own party. He'll get no thanks for it from the left, either. I wait eagerly to see whether he can pull this off. --Nic Duquette [link]


New Government Approved in Iraq... Chalabi gets Minister of Oil. Uh-oh. You know what that means. Maureen Dowd has about 15 fewer words to agonize over for her next column.

Twenty-seven ministers and five acting officials gained approval from 180 members of the 185 who were present in the 275-member Parliament, ending a three-month political stalemate that has appeared to be fueling violence... Six women will share the administration of seven ministries. --Michael Weiss [link]


Wednesday, April 27, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

Decline of the West? Jesus, Not That Again... Joseph Bottum, the Thomas Aquinus of The Weekly Standard, weighs in on His Most Crustified Recent Eminence:

Does anyone doubt that Western Europe is tumbling downward? It cannot summon the will to reproduce itself. It has aborted and contracepted its birthrate down toward demographic disaster: perhaps 1.4 children per couple across the western end of the continent, when simple replacement requires a rate around 2.1. It can discover neither how to absorb nor how to halt the waves of Islamic immigrants swamping its cities, and it has proved supine in the face of those immigrants' anti-Semitism, anti-Christianism, and even anti-Europeanism.

Look Joseph, I'm an American, New York-born -- New York, that saturnine city -- and I'm perfectly happy to see the Continent finally exhibit a lazy Malthusian continence from below, rather than have it legislated from above. And the litany of "antis" you attribute to immigrants does not detract from the xenophobic creepiness of the phrase, "the will to reproduce itself."

Two or three days after his election, a journalist violated every rule of the Holy See's etiquette by shouting out [to John Paul II] at a papal audience, "Are you going to Poland?" Leo XIII would have had the Swiss Guard take the man down for a session in the Holy Office's penitential dungeons. Pius XII would have sat silent and stared--through those harsh, wire-rim glasses he wore--for as long as it took to make even a reporter blush. But John Paul gave instead his trademark, tilt-headed smile and said, "Wait and see, wait and see." It was said to be the first unscripted answer a pope had ever made to a journalist.

Mark the sequel to this walk down memory lane with the more irascible Leo and Pius...

In point of fact, as a few Vaticanologists have noted, Ratzinger's tenure at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith was one of the most lenient ever.

See above for the history against which to compare such "leniency." The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith used to clock in under the no less euphemistic title of the "Holy Office of the Inquisition." "Hey, Torquemada, whaddya say?" "I just got back from an auto-da-fe!" "Auto-da-fe, what's an auto-da-fe?" "It's what you shouldn't do, but you do it anyway!" Sorry. Guilty as sin for coughing up the same liberal-media spiel about the Ratz.

He's a Social Democrat, after all, from Germany, where they always thought they were going to find a way to split the difference between communism and capitalism.

Not to mention another shorter-lived "ism" that springs to mind. I don't think I'm being reactionary or hyperbolic to remember the kind of "regime change" that defined the days of General Schleicher and von Papen. The Church affiliation with this shamed center-left ruling party of the 1930's is an area for historical repudiation and apology -- which, to be fair, Ratzinger was instrumental in bringing about under his predecessor's pontificate. But the secular side of things are now moot since, as Bottum admits, it's a cultural cold war against "relativism" that's being waged. In that, the Father, the Son and the Holy Ghost are apparently the only conservative "bloc" that counts.

Now the job has fallen to Benedict XVI, who must find a way to reason, with those who no longer believe much in reason, that intellectual seriousness and moral rationality--"the postulate and the condition of Christianity"--can still guide Europe away from the new Dark Ages.

Please. --Michael Weiss [link]


The George W. Dollar Coin... That sounds like a joke, but it looks as though it's going to happen. Sorry, rabid liberals. The bill passed the house with only six nay votes. Barring something unexpected in the Senate, in 2018 there will be a George W. Bush dollar coin. In the interim, look forward to dollars featuring luminaries such as James Garfield, James K. Polk, Gerald Ford, and Herbert Hoover.

That's right -- it's time once again to give the government money in return for legal tender, patriotically etched copper-nickel alloy. The fifty state quarters cost a nickle apiece to mint, and a large share of them went right into children's display maps and hermetically sealed coin preservation envelopes. That's free money for the government. Now imagine doing the same thing with a coin worth four times as much, and you have the reasoning behind the presidential dollar coin bill.

The only problem I see with the scheme -- other than having to look at Chester Arthur's muttonchops every time I break a five in February 2009 -- is that it gives the government a way to raise money without running a deficit or raising taxes. Soon there will be collectible half-dollar vice presidents, great Civil War battle dimes, random shit Franklin did two-dollar coins, and then they'll just start stamping whatever they can think of on there. It's going to be like the freakin' post office. Elvis on every coin minted the day of his Ed Sullivan appearance. Special red bills for Valentine's Day. You'll be able to custom etch your face on the penny for twenty bucks. Sorry, Abe. --Nic Duquette [link]


Scrap Bolton for Dad?... Thomas Friedman -- who in the last few days has earned enough style-based obloquies from this site to warrant his own Dowdian nickname: ToFro -- sounds a lot like a cuddlier Jesse Helms in his latest Times column, which calls for the rescission of John Bolton's U.N. nod.

In short, I don't much care how the U.N. works as a bureaucracy; I care about how often it can be enlisted to support, endorse and amplify U.S. power. That is what serves our national interest.

Then he drops the triumphalism and channels his inner Bono:

"Reforming the U.N." is without question one of the most tired, vacuous conservative mantras ever invented. It is right up there with squeezing "waste, fraud and abuse" out of the Pentagon's budget. If the White House is concerned about waste, fraud and abuse, let's start with Tom DeLay and our own House.

But all this, after he make a rather provocative alternate choice for the ambassadorship: George Bush, Sr. No shit:

Look, John Quincy Adams went back to Congress after he served as president. Why shouldn't George H. W. Bush take another spin around the diplomatic dance floor he loved so much and where he left his biggest mark? He's already demonstrated with his parachute jumps that he has the stamina for the job, and his performance as a tsunami relief ambassador was a great success.

The irony there of course is that the man who wants to replace the burnished patina of "US legitimacy" doesn't seem to anticipate the jeers and sneers that'll come if Pops heads to New York.

Trotsky once referred to Sir Joseph Austen Chamberlain, brother of you-know-who and erstwhile British secretary of state for foreign affairs, as "that modern pocket edition Pitt." (Trotsky had his own beef with the Anglo-Soviet Communist alliance, which Stalin royally fucked and betrayed, as he would eventually do everything.) But Chamberlain's father -- just Joseph -- was a ruthless agitator for the expansion of British empire, as were both "unabridged" 18th-century Pitts (or "Pisses," as Alan Bennett had them in a memorable scence of The Madness of George III). William the Elder and William the Younger both said and did everything they could -- one as prime minister, the other as PM-understudy -- to stop the American revolution from happening.

Now Just imagine if Bush I ever became the visible pinion of the diplomatic wing of Bush II's "Doctrine." Would the Adams' family values be the sort most immediately invoked? --Michael Weiss [link]


When Pushkin Comes to Shove... Hitch stalks the Caucasus in The Atlantic this month. His quarry is Mikhail Lermontov's celebrated tribute to the candle that burns twice as bright and only half as long, A Hero of Our Time.

One is more than tempted to speculate that Lermontov made Pechorin do what Pushkin could not: discover the plot against his life and then act with ruthlessness and cold decision to ensure that it was the assassin who was assassinated. This makes it the more eerie that he was incapable of such resolution in his own life and death. Czar Nicholas I had denounced A Hero of Our Time in a clumsy letter to his wife. (As Anthony Powell, a superior contriver of literary and social coincidence, once phrased it, "In spite of Russia's great size, the number of people who actually operated things politically, socially, culturally, was very small. Thus a poetry-writing subaltern could be a real thorn in the side of the Tsar himself.") When Lermontov was brought to the field of honor, he apparently declined to fire on the fool who had provoked the duel. Slain on the spot, he never heard the czar's reported comment: "A dog's death for a dog." His unflinching indifference on the occasion, however, drew on two well-rehearsed nineteenth-century scenarios: the contemptuous aristocrat on the scaffold, and the stoic revolutionary in front of the firing squad. The Decembrists, in their way, admired and emulated both models.

That's the problem with being the founding literary father of a nation as geographically and spiritually large as Russia: the eventual court conservatism is a given. (From Virgil to Bellow, show me a laureate of letters of whom this hasn't been true.) Nabokov says in The Gift that the reader of Pushkin "has the capacity of his lungs enlarged." With an Eastern emigre's shift of longitude, we can see this respiratory exuberance being generated by a hills-and-daffodils poet like Wordsworth, but surely not by his most hilarious and unremitting critic Byron, whose own bailiwick lay in the enlargement of other organs. Indeed:

The Casanova complex -- a hectic and indiscriminate pursuit of women who are not truly desired -- is sometimes suspected of being a masking symptom of the repressed homosexual. Byron's frantic activity in this sphere (or do I mean in these spheres?) has long been a subject in its own right. Powell mentions that although the duel that extinguished Pushkin was apparently about his wife's supposed adultery, "there were also homosexual undercurrents in the circles involved."

This is from Don Juan:

I've known a dozen weddings made even thus [by female coercion],
And some of them high names: I have also known
Young men who--though they hated to discuss
Pretensions which they never dreamed to have shown--
Yet neither frighten'd by a female fuss,
Nor by mustachios moved, were let alone,
And lived, as did the brokenhearted fair,
In happier plight than if they form'd a pair.

There's also nightly, to the uninitiated,
A peril--not indeed like love or marriage,
But not the less for this to be depreciated:
It is --I meant and mean not to disparage
The show of virtue even in the vitiated--
It adds an outward grace unto their carriage--
But to denounce the amphibious sort of harlot,
Couleur de rose, who's neither white nor scarlet.

That first stanza could be the epigraph on any state bill legalizing gay marriage. That second one, with its ambiguous ("amphibious") coloring ("couleur de rose") of language leaves some doubt as to whether Byron's still talking about a woman. The ambiguity here, at least, is set in greater relief than it is in some of the more eyebrow-raising, gender-bending sonnets of Shakespeare. And whereas the Bard's off-page activities are still -- pace Stephen Greenblatt -- cloaked in mystery, the sherbert-and-pederasty and sister-fucking chapters in Byron's biography are pretty unexpurgated. You can also, if you're in a frisky Gus Van Sant kind of mood, try and "read" Peter the Great's affection for the "Blackamoor" of Pushkin's famous short story in much the same way... --Michael Weiss [link]


Our New RSS Feed... We've gone Seattle Starbucks-trashing global, baby! Just point your RSS reader to the link attached to ye old icon to your left, or here, and get daily updates from this site. Like Kirsty Alley, we only deserve to get fed once a day, so there may be some lag time between "Really Simple Syndication" and Really Real Publication. (For Your Information.) --Michael Weiss [link]
Nogger: Not-Nice Cream... Fuckin' Swedes. Can't they do anything without giving flaxen blue-eyed offense? The logo for some Stockhomey-brand ice cream product:

Which, you've got to admit, is quite an improvement on R&D's other suggestions: Manding-Rings, Klondyke Bar (what would you do for one, bitch?), Vera Drakes Cake. Check your grocer's freezer!

Slate's got the full skinny. --Michael Weiss [link]


He Makes It Too Easy Sometimes... Like Tom Lehrer's epitaph on satire when Henry Kissinger won the Nobel Peace Prize.

President Bush raised eyebrows on Tuesday when he asked locals in Galveston, Texas: "Do you still have Splash Day?"

"Splash Day" is the annual "adult oriented enormous beach party" celebration on the Gulf Coast.

BUSH: Do you still have Splash Day?

(LAUGHTER)

BUSH: You have to be a baby boomer to know what I'm talking about.

(LAUGHTER)

BUSH: I'm not saying whether I came or not on Splash Day. I'm just saying, Do you have Splash Day?

(LAUGHTER)

Bush was unaware "Splash Day" is now a fully gay and lesbian event on the beaches.

That this comes courtesy of Drudge ... it's like the anti-matter of satire. --Michael Weiss [link]


Monday, April 25, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

The Pain...The Merck Vioxx recall looked like it would be the corporate malfeasance story of the year when it broke. But within twenty-four hours, the media astonishingly began to tilt toward a neutral position, or even toward favoring the faceless corporate giant over the little guy who allegedly had a heart attack caused by Merck's painkiller. Reason ran an effective story defending Merck based on the evidence, while even the Times ran a little guy article -- about the plight of tortured arthritis sufferers who didn't care about the cardiac risks, buying up the shrinking supply on the stuff on the black market. (That weepy article is no longer online.)

But now that it's going to trial, the first Merck liability case looks to make the Michael Jackson case seem a black-and-white cover-slammer. Nobody involved looks to be unbiased. Consider:

- It appears Merck may have pressured its scientists to hide cardiac death data, after all.

- The widow of the alleged victim supplied some boxes of the Vioxx her husband was supposedly taking when he had a heart attack. But the lot numbers on the boxes indicates that the pills weren't manufactured until after the man died.

- The judge presiding over the case received huge reelection campaign contributions from the lawyers for the plaintiff.

- The case was brought in this district of Alabama specifically because it's among the poorest and least educated parts of the state, on the assumption that fine points of medical science might as well be presented to a team of sled dogs as any jury likely to be assembled.

That nobody appeares exculpable in this mess turns this into prime litigious farce. Let's do some justice, baby. --Nic Duquette [link]


Jon Stewart: A Sheep In Wolfe's Clothing... Every liberal I've ever talked to who claims to be an admirer of Tom Wolfe, despite the novelist's avowed conservative politics, always offers the same apologia: "Yeah, but he's an equal opportunity offender. He satirizes the left and the right." I always wonder if it isn't a pretty satiric campaign they themselves are mounting as people who claim to have actually read Wolfe's books. (Even Orwell, who famously misjudged Dickens on his Tory-ish alignment, at least misjudged him in all the right ways.) Alternatively, I've heard Republican votaries of Billy Bragg -- Billy Bragg! -- tell me that you can actually siphon out the "radical socialist agenda" from the music and appreciate tracks like "I Dreamed I Saw Phil Ochs Last Night" and "Waiting for the Great Leap Forwards" on a strictly musical level. (The singer-songwriter for whom the question of "mixing pop and politics" causes the languid resort to "embarassment" and "usual excuses" would have an unequivocal incitement to riot if he ever heard such nonsense.)

So now people who do concede Jon Stewart's "left-of-center" affiliation still maintain that The Daily Show is fundamentally non-partisan and merely opposed to cant and stupidity and lying. Not so, says City Journal writer Harry Stein, who, it must be said, doesn't argue the case as effectively as he might or should. Still, evidence like this hardly needs elaborating:

[Stewart] appeared to be making a far bolder move a couple of months later when, with the democratic tide rising in the Middle East, he acknowledged that maybe Bush’s policy in the region hadn’t been so loony after all. He admitted that such a thought left him full of “cognitive dissonance,” but “when you see the Lebanese in the streets, you say, ‘Oh my God, it’s working!’"

“[P]retty soon, Republicans are gonna be like, ‘Reagan was nothing compared to this guy,’ ” Stewart added, cradling his head in his hands. “Like, my kid’s gonna go to a high school named after him, I just know it.”

“Well,” comforted his guest, a die-hard former Clinton official, “there’s still Iran and North Korea, don’t forget.”

“Iran and North Korea,” echoed Stewart hopefully, as he thrust crossed fingers up in the air for luck. “That’s true, that is true.”

At least somewhat reassured, his audience roared.

Of course, this kind of laughter in the dark doesn't actually mean that there are people who harbor such antipathy toward the president that they now openly pray for his (and our) failure on explosive matters of foreign policy, much less root for Ayatollah Khamanei and Kim Jong-Il. No way! Just you try and get away with putting something like that over on the American people and you'll risk being asked the biggest wife-beating media question of them all: "Where's your sense of humor?" --Michael Weiss [link]


Pay Up, Jacko... Michael Jackson owes Bank of America $270 million. The fact does not impress me except that I must wonder if there is any connection between this and the bank's simultaneous refusal to clean it's own fucking ATM stations, or to provide them functioning pens, or to make sure the machines are working properly. --Mark Grueter [link]
Iraqi Prison Abuses... Four officers cleared, including Sanchez. I don't like the idea of appointing an "independent council" to investigate (or re-investigate) the torture of Iraqi detainees because such congeries usually resort to grandstanding and PR campaigning before they even question a single witness. The matter should be resolved internally, by the military. But not by the United States military alone. Why not create an ad hoc international tribunal to investigate the war crimes of this war (you know, like the permanent and authoritative tribunal this country still doesn't recognize for any wars)? The members could be culled from the high-ranking officer corps of the coalition. Why shouldn't British and Polish and Australian adjuticants sit in judgment of American soldiers? This would surely lower the temperature of intrigue and cover-up surrounding the Abu Ghraib scandal, and it'd keep our senators and congressmen safe from feats of Zogby-derived heroism. --Michael Weiss [link]
Not BBC Hecklers After All... An inflammatory headline on yesterday's Drudge Report reads: "BBC plants hecklers to disrupt UK Conservative Rally..." and links to the corresponding article in The Daily Telegraph.

After loyally making the case for the Tories against the BBC, the Telegraph writer, reveals the fact that the BBC insists the hecklers it filmed were NOT in any way affiliated with the BBC, much less "planted" there by them. This is a boneheaded attempt by Drudge to prove yet again how "liberal" the media is, here and abroad. --Mark Grueter [link]


Saturday, April 23, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

You're The One For Me, Fatty... I like the spirit of fuck-you regimen rebelliousness in this column, but the joke practically burns itself up in the atmosphere of the lead. (Though for a piece about winning through sinning, I suppose it's appropriate that the comedy is mainly ham.)

Voluptuous Catskills conservatism against the way we live now (as if that were a distinction with a real difference.)

"Tomorrow the enlarging of consciousness by diet and breathing; but to-day the struggle." --Michael Weiss [link]


Hast Though Slain the Filibuster?... In a move certainly directed at putting an end to fun-in-politics altogether, Dick Cheney and the Republicans are about to change the Senate rules, making filibustering a thing of the past. If all kids are like I was at age 10, the word "filibuster" is the only thing they find even remotely interesting when learning about their country's politics. The word itself is a snicker-inducer in elementary school classrooms, and the image of a 60-year-old Senator rambling on and on and on for hours just because he doesn't like some proposed idea is just plain funny, not to mention a good racket to try on your parents. Now, with the removal of this anarchist tactic, Cheney will effectively be stopping any potentially government-bound adolescents in their tracks. I bet he hasn't thought of that consequence. --Orli Sharaby [link]
Friday, April 22, 2005 - snarktip@snarksmith.com
AIM: "snarksmithy"

Supe's Up... Letting aside for the nonce that "Man of Steel" in Russian is "Stalin," Superman's return to cultural center stage seems perfectly well timed now that the neocons apparently control everything. Remember: Jorel was Krypton's genius stateman and pioneering intellectual who, in agitating to warn his government about the planet's impending apocalypse, became its lone Cassandra, or "Prophet Unarmed." Prior to this he earned some measure of fame for thwarting a reactionary general plotting a coup. This general was banished to a one-dimensional "Phantom Zone," which sounds an awful lot like Siberia. So a fairly hawkish papa, you might say. And the greatest dialectic is that we all eventually become a reconstructed version of our parents, right? Dad (thesis), Kid (antithesis), Grown-up Kid (synthesis). So where the franchise left off -- Superman promising the UN General Assembly to rid our world of all nuclear weapons, like some airborne Alan Alda -- it picks up with Blue Boy doing... What? Puttering around the golf course with Cheney and Scalia would be my guess. Next stop, World Bank. Jihadis beware.

Hugh Laurie, the BBC's Bertie Wooster, is cast as Perry White in Bryan Singer's new sequel. --Michael Weiss [link]


Today's Friedmanism... I love Tom Friedman's opinions, but since his writing is getting roasted today, I'd like to point out today's jarring cliche-pairing:

The other very real thing Mr. Blair has done is to get the Labor Party in Britain to firmly embrace the free market and globalization - sometimes kicking and screaming.

An odd embrace, that. Rough on the shins and the ears. --Nic Duquette [link]


Matt Taibbi: All's Forgiven For the Lame Pope Jokes... Thomas Friedman's columns are less susceptible to a close reading of stylistic whoopsy-daisies and thundering solecisms than Maureen Dowd's columns are. This is because the latter has very little to say and spends 750 words saying it the way Cathy might if she got laid more often and her comic strip was set in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. (Where would MoDo be without the verbally jazzercized sneers and "Hungry like the Wolfowitz" clunkers?) But Friedman induces a fugue state of uncritical absorption and comprehension of the "Big Picture" in geopolitics, as though a strange but wise Himalayan mystic had taken over the Times op-ed page every Wednesday and Friday. "The Muslims are angry, we must show them the path." "Freedom is nice, it has pleased the Jew in us all." "We must become the master our fear before our fear becomes our master. My son's Lebanese soccer coach told me this."

So it's a distinct pleasure to see someone go to work on Friedman over the sheer infelicity of his prose. The recently imperiled writer at the New York Press, Matt Taibbi:

"I stomped off, went through security, bought a Cinnabon, and glumly sat at the back of the B line, waiting to be herded on board so that I could hunt for space in the overhead bins."

Forget the Cinnabon. Name me a herd animal that hunts. Name me one.

This would be a small thing were it not for the overall pattern. Thomas Friedman does not get these things right even by accident. It's not that he occasionally screws up and fails to make his metaphors and images agree. It's that he always screws it up. He has an anti-ear, and it's absolutely infallible; he is a Joyce or a Flaubert in reverse, incapable of rendering even the smallest details without genius. The difference between Friedman and an ordinary bad writer is that an ordinary bad writer will, say, call some businessman a shark and have him say some tired, uninspired piece of dialogue: Friedman will have him spout it. And that's guaranteed, every single time. He never misses.

This is laugh-out-loud funny:

"As I left the Infosys campus that evening along the road back to Bangalore, I kept chewing on that phrase: 'The playing field is being leveled.'

"What Nandan is saying, I thought, is that the playing field is being flattened... Flattened? Flattened? My God, he's telling me the world is flat!"

This is like three pages into the book, and already the premise is totally fucked. Nilekani said level, not flat. The two concepts are completely different. Level is a qualitative idea that implies equality and competitive balance; flat is a physical, geographic concept that Friedman, remember, is openly contrasting -- ironically, as it were -- with Columbus's discovery that the world is round.

Except for one thing. The significance of Columbus's discovery was that on a round earth, humanity is more interconnected than on a flat one. On a round earth, the two most distant points are closer together than they are on a flat earth. But Friedman is going to spend the next 470 pages turning the "flat world" into a metaphor for global interconnectedness. Furthermore, he is specifically going to use the word round to describe the old, geographically isolated, unconnected world... That he misattributes his thesis to Nilekani is perfect: Friedman is a person who not only speaks in malapropisms, he also hears malapropisms. Told level; heard flat. This is the intellectual version of Far Out Space Nuts, when NASA repairman Bob Denver sets a whole sitcom in motion by pressing "launch" instead of "lunch" in a space capsule. And once he hits that button, the rocket takes off.

--Michael Weiss [link]


Breaking All Rules And Not Even Learning Them First... There is something pretty shabby about the democratization of poetry. It's become an art that can be practiced as casually as it is (or isn't) appreciated, which is to say real examples of its artistry are becoming rarer and rarer. At college, I edited a sometimes not-terrible-at-all humor magazine. Our office was right next door to the well-funded headquarters of quite a number of undergraduate literary journals, and every so often, in between labored dick and fart joke, I'd peak in to peruse what gem-like flames were burning up the recycled pages of academic composition. Frankly, I couldn't tell who in the business of real comedy. Still-born mutts passed for doggerel. Iambs were unheard of, much less heeded. Meter and rhyme -- best save those for the anti-globalism placards. In short: no one knew what the hell they were doing when it came to versification.

The teaching and study of form is nowadays met with (ahem) a "wardrobe of excuses" for why such a thing is either superfluous or -- if you can believe this and you shouldn't -- sinister. Modernism killed prosody, we're told. Sonnets, villanelles, witty and necessarily orderly vers de societe -- all "constructs" of The Man trying to keep everybody down.

I usually don't defer to The New Criterion on matters of literary judgment, but this essay is a sobering eulogy on the kind of conservativism* that doesn't make for bad politics, but true beauty.

*Actually, Ezra Pound, whom the author is far too generous towards, was a fascist in the actual, non-poetic sense of the term. And he's best remembered for injecting technical chaos where it didn't belong. T.S. Eliot, with his roots that clutch and his branches growing out of Pound's stony rubbish, redeemed the chaos. --Michael Weiss [link]


Sydney Pollack: Consummate Schmauteur... Who let Slate go and get so wised-up about American cinema?

It's often suggested that Pollack has an unrivaled knack for wringing great performances out of his actors. On the set of Tootsie, his best film, he butted heads with Dustin Hoffman, and the battles lent Hoffman's performance an electricity, a great unease. (And for once Pollack juggled the embarrassment of talent, with bit parts for Terri Garr, Bill Murray, Charles Durning, and Pollack himself.) Pollack's later work rar